Legal Opinion

Pacific Construction Finance Co. v. Kramer

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1940No. Civ. No. 12787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoCOMB, J.

From an order granting defendant's mo. tion for a change of venue of an action from Los Angeles *191County to Santa Barbara County on the ground that defendant was a resident of the latter county, plaintiff appeals.

The complaint in two counts alleged that plaintiff and defendant had entered into a contract in the city of Los Angeles. The first cause of action is predicated upon defendant’s failure to pay plaintiff a commission alleged to be due, pursuant to the contract, and the second cause of action is for damages resulting from breach of the alleged contract by defendant.

This is the sole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Work v. Associated Almond GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Miratti v. Banca Popolare FugaziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. ZacharyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Rench v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Hardy v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Slaughter v. MeroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API