Legal Opinion
Randall v. Randall
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 20, 1944No. 231PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DE VANE, District Judge.
1. This action was instituted for the purpose of dissolving an irrevocable trust.
2. Plaintiff Mary Bell Randall is the donor and the life beneficiary of a certain trust created by a trust agreement executed August 23, 1932. George DeGolyer Randall, Laura Randall Huttig, Walter Doane Randall, Donald Treat Randall, a minor, and Herbert Thomson Randall, all being children of the donor, are named in said trust agreement as the beneficiaries of said trust. All of said named beneficiaries, with the exception of Donald Treat Randall, were adults at the time said trust was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bell's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Ridley v. HallidayTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- MacLay v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Crosby v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McAllister v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Alcott v. Union Planters National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- McAllister v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- McPartland v. Palmer, Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida, St. Lucie County1974