Legal Opinion

Platte Valley Bank v. Harding

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The Platte Valley Bank sued Harding in the District Court for Otoe county, upon a promissory note made by him, whereby he promised to pay to “The Platte Valley Bank or order, $400, etc.” The plaintiff claimed to be incorporated by an act of the legislature of the Territory of Nebraska.

Read the full summary

The Platte Valley Bank sued Harding in the District Court for Otoe county, upon a promissory note made by him, whereby he promised to pay to “The Platte Valley Bank or order, $400, etc.” The plaintiff claimed to be incorporated by an act of the legislature of the Territory of Nebraska. The defendant denied that it was incorporated, because, he insisted, that the alleged act of incorporation conflicted with an act of Congress entitled “An act to disapprove and annul certain acts of the Territorial Legislature of Florida, and for other purposes.” Be it enacted by the Senate and House of…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court,

by Hall Ch. J.,

held that the question of the incorporation of the bank could not be raised in this cause, because the defendants were estopped to deny the same.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McCornack v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Exchange National Bank v. CappsNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bair v. People's BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Eiseley v. TaggartNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API