Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Executive Office for the United States Attorney

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-0094Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SANTOS MAXIMINO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-94 (JDB) EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Santos Maximino Garcia, proceeding pro se, brought this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, against defendant, the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”), Compl. [ECF No. 1] at 1. Plaintiff seeks “disclosure of all information germane to prosecution witness Noe Cruz,” a cooperating witness who testified for the government in Garcia’s…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API