Legal Opinion

Niblock v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 31, 1985No. 57,910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, C.J.:

This is a K.S.A. 60-1507 proceeding. The defendant, Philip Anthony Niblock, argues that the Honorable Richard W. Wahl should have been disqualified from hearing the 60-1507 motion because of the judge’s prior ex parte communication with the Kansas Correctional Institution at Lansing concerning defendant’s sentence, and that defendant’s sentences should all run concurrently.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced in 1980 as follows:

Count I - Aggravated robbery, K.S.A. 21-3427, five to twenty years, beginning September 22, 1980.

Count II — Felony theft, K.S.A. 21-3701, two to five…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Hulme v. WoleslagelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. State v. NiblockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. WolcottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. State v. ClothierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API