Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 5, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 3:87-489-16PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENDERSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment and for attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, the Court (1) grants the defendant’s summary judgment motion in part and denies it in part; (2) denies the plaintiff’s summary judgment motion in toto; and (3) denies both parties’ motions for attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the Court directs that final judgment be entered in favor of the defendant.
The following facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff has been a partner in the law firm of Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough (“Law Firm”)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ceasar v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers Construction Industry Health and Security Fund v. O'Bunco Engineering International Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025