Hirsch v. Rochester City Police Department
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant Nicholas Hirsch, proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s judgment dismissing his lawsuit sua sponte and imposing a leave-to-file sanction. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
We review a district court’s sua sponte dismissal of a complaint de novo. Sykes v. Bank of Am., 723 F.3d 399, 403 (2d. Cir.2013). Pro se submissions are generally reviewed with “special solicitude,” and we interpret those submissions to raise the strongest claims suggested. Triestman v. Fed. Bureau…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Michael & Kathleen M. Ruotolo v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foy v. New York State Unified Court SystemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Jason-Lamar Eustache v. Discover Financial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Michael James Wells v. Attorney Brian BarrettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Natalie J. Oksen v. Fort Drum Mountain Community Homes, LLC., et. al.District Court, N.D. New York · 2026