Michael & Kathleen M. Ruotolo v. Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-appellants Michael and Kathleen M. Ruotolo (the “Ruotolos”), pro se, appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Daly, J.), entered December 16,1993, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Ruotolos also appeal from the district court’s March 7, 1994 order denying their motion for reconsideration. We reverse, because the Ruotolos, pro se litigants, were not advised of the consequences of not timely responding to a motion for summary judgment before the district court granted the motion in defendant’s favor. We need not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Frank Graham v. Correctional Sergeant Lewinski, Correctional Officer Piechoki, Correctional Officer Schimley, Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Tyrone H. Maggette v. Stephen DalsheimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3Cited by362 opinions
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Tracy v. FreshwaterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Jackson v. Federal ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Mcpherson v. CoombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Coleman Vital v. Interfaith Medical Center and Local 1199Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
357 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.