United States v. Lugo
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendant Mercado has moved to dismiss the indictment against him on the grounds that the indictment is defective because it joins him with two other defendants but does not disclose facts necessary to make joinder proper under Rule 8(b).
Rule 8(b) provides in part as follows: “Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. * * * ”
The movant points out that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. William Hermann GodelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. CharnayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. WelshDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- United States v. HarvickDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- United States v. J. Tirocchi & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. CullenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
- United States v. MoriartyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- United States v. Campbell Hardware, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979