Legal Opinion

State v. Hamlin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNCAN, Judge.

The defendants, Ricky Hamlin, Paula Hamlin and Alberta Layne, appeal from the denial of their petitions for suspended sentences. This appeal has presented problems that have been most difficult for us to solve. However, as we will hereinafter explain, we have reached the only decision that can be made, considering the posture of the record before us.

The record shows that the defendants reached a plea bargain agreement with the State to the effect that they would plead guilty to various charges involving passing and/or possessing counterfeit bills, with penitentiary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GivhanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  2. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  3. Bowmer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mayfield v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McConnell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. State v. MahlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hoover v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API