Legal Opinion
United States v. King
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided November 16, 1988No. CM 447533PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL
FELDER, Senior Judge:
Appellant was tried by a military judge serving as a general court-martial at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of murder while attempting to commit rape in violation of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 918 (1982). The military judge sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for life, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved a dishonorable…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. SagerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. LincolnU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. SagerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. StephensonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.