Legal Opinion
United States v. Sager
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided March 30, 1990No. ACMR 8801566PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VARO, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of officers and enlisted members of rape and four specifications of indecent acts in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence provides for a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-five years, total forfeitures, and reduction to Private El.
Statement of Facts
On 1 August and 17 August 1987, the appellant was interviewed by the Riley County, Kansas, Police Department…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SagerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. GrootersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. SagerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991