Legal Opinion

Chung Wook Myung v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1972No. 72-1202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In challenging the respondent’s order that he be deported, the petitioner makes two contentions. He first argues that the Service abused its discretion in denying his application, based upon alleged hardship, for suspension of his deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1254. In United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy, 353 U.S. 72, 77, 77 S.Ct. 618, 621, 1 L.Ed.2d 652 (1957), the Supreme Court wrote: “Suspension of deportation is a matter of discretion and of administrative grace, not mere eligibility; discretion must be exercised even though statutory prerequisites have been met.” In the light of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hintopoulos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Behzad Kasravi v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Giuseppe Errico v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Bruce Clifford PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lai Haw Wong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Lourdes Cabuco-Flores v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Genevieve L. Mangabat v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. DA LOMBABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
  4. Federiso v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. FEDERISOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API