State v. Harrison
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of possession of heroin, defendant appeals asserting that “[t]he search of the defendant’s person exceeded the scope of the warrant and affidavit. No probable cause for the search existed, nor were there exigent circumstances which would justify a warrantless search.”
Detectives Florio, Smith and Garcia, pursuant to a search warrant, were authorized to search a motel room and a named occupant, Dionel Tenorio. The applicant for the search warrant, Florio, knew defendant would be in the room. Florio testified, “We met with the informant again prior to executing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BroadnaxWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. VillanuevaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. BroadnaxWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. PenaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.