Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 8, 1996No. Criminal No. 90-349PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is petitioner’s motion for reduction or modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), based upon a recent amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Upon consideration of the entire record and the relevant authorities, the Court finds U.S.S.G. Amendment 506 to be inconsistent with the Congressional mandate of 28 U.S.C. § 994(h), and therefore invalid as a matter of law. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to modify his sentence is denied.

Background

In 1990 a jury found petitioner and his co-defendant, Carl Gedde,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Miles Davis SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API