Legal Opinion

Finney v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 6, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Judge.

This appeal arises from a Jefferson Circuit Court conviction upon a charge of theft by unlawful taking over $100, enhanced by the status offense of persistent felony offender II. The relevant facts will be presented in discussion of the assigned errors.

Finney’s first assignment is that the lower Court erred in not giving an instruction delineating his right not to have testified during the PFO proceeding. Carter v. Kentucky, 450 U.S. 288, 101 S.Ct. 1112, 67 L.Ed.2d 241 (1981), rendered nearly five months prior to this action, held that when requested by the defendant, the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. McKinney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lazarus C. Finney v. Harry J. Rothgerber, Jr., Kentucky Parole Board, George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. K.R. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hibbard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hibbard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API