Legal Opinion

State v. Richards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 2014No. 110933856; A151186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, entered after a bench trial, for attempted murder, ORS 163.115; ORS 161.405, assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, and two counts of menacing, ORS 163.190. He assigns error to the trial court’s exclusion of a witness statement as hearsay, arguing that the statement falls within the “excited utterance” exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule. See OEC 802 (rule against hearsay); OEC 803(2) (hearsay rule does not exclude “[a] statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. HRENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. BeisserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. HudsonJosephine County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. BementCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API