Legal Opinion

Slater v. Berlin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1951No. 1088, 1089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Slater sued Berlin for an alleged breach by Berlin of a contract to buy a house from Slater. Berlin denied liability, alleging he was .induced to sign the contract by misrepresentations made to him by an agent of Wickersham, the broker in the transaction. Berlin also filed a counterclaim against Slater for return of the . cash deposit made by him when the contract was signed. Berlin also filed a third-party complaint against Wickersham and Peterson, the employee of Wickersham,"for return of the deposit, and joined as defendants to this claim Home Indemnity Insurance…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Slater v. BerlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Hentz v. CBI-Fairmac Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hentz v. CBI-Fairmac Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API