Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 6, 1961No. 1451Published

1Opinion of the Court

HIRAM CHURCH FORD, Chief Judge.

After having been unsuccessful in an effort to secure relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (Scott v. United States, decided June 30, 1961, 292 F.2d 49, 6 Cir.) the Petitioner J. Paul Scott here seeks the same type of relief upon other grounds by resorting to a motion for arrest of judgment under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. A.

After the lapse of more than four years since the determination of *681Petitioner’s guilt under the indictment in question, he now seeks vacation of the judgment on the ground that the charges set out in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. William Howard Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. J. Paul Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. George Colquette v. United States of America, Clarence Manns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API