Scott v. United States
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
HIRAM CHURCH FORD, Chief Judge.
After having been unsuccessful in an effort to secure relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (Scott v. United States, decided June 30, 1961, 292 F.2d 49, 6 Cir.) the Petitioner J. Paul Scott here seeks the same type of relief upon other grounds by resorting to a motion for arrest of judgment under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. A.
After the lapse of more than four years since the determination of *681Petitioner’s guilt under the indictment in question, he now seeks vacation of the judgment on the ground that the charges set out in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- William Howard Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- J. Paul Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- George Colquette v. United States of America, Clarence Manns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.