Legal Opinion

Gara v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1935No. Appeals, 302 and 303PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted this action of trespass against the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company for injuries to the wife. The jury returned a verdict in their favor. Subsequently judgment n. o. v. was entered for defendant, and it is from this action of the court below that plaintiffs appeal, assigning as error the entry of judgment in defendant’s favor..

West Allegheny Avenue runs east and west in the City of Philadelphia. It is 50 feet wide from curb to curb and has two 36-foot sidewalks. There are double car tracks on this street, for eastbound and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Virgilio v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Hawk v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Clark v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. McGovern v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tharp v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bockstoce Et Ux. v. Pittsbgh. Rwys. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Starovetsky v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Stolpe v. Duquesne CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Christopher v. General Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API