Legal Opinion

Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, L.L.P. v. Revenue Cabinet

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 22, 2002No. 2000-CA-002784-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARBER, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether a law firm is required to pay use tax upon charges for photocopies of medical and hospital records acquired from out-of-state providers in connection with litigation. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the transactions at issue are not subject to the use tax and reverse.

The Appellant, Woodward, Hopson & Fulton, L.L.P. (‘Woodward”), is a Kentucky law firm. The Revenue Cabinet audited Woodward for the period of January 1, 1984 through March 31, 1993, and determined that $2,592.79 was owed in use tax on Woodward’s acquisition of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Revenue CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. York v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1991
  4. Revenue Cabinet v. Joy Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  5. Revenue Cabinet v. Lazarus, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LOUISVILLE METRO DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  2. Treece, Alfrey, Musat & Bosworth, PC v. Department of FinanceColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. John K. Carter v. Oldham County Extension DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API