Legal Opinion

Treece, Alfrey, Musat & Bosworth, PC v. Department of Finance

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2011No. 11CA0026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

In this use tax dispute, defendant, the Department of Finance of the City and County of Denver (Denver), appeals the district court’s judgment reversing a hearing officer’s determination that plaintiff, Treeee, Alfrey, Musat & Bosworth, P.C. (law firm), owed use tax upon the cost of obtaining copies of medical records from health care providers for the law firm’s use in litigation. The court determined that payments by the law firm to health care providers did not constitute the purchase of tangible personal property in a retail sale. We affirm.

I. Background

The law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Sickle v. BoyesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. City of Boulder v. Leanin' Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Colorado Consumer Health Initiative v. Colorado Board of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Frisch, Dudek & Slattery, Ltd. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Expedia, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Hotsenpiller v. MorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. v. Ford Motor CoColorado Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API