Legal Opinion
Prudential Ins. v. Battershill
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1946No. 11461PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The policy upon which this suit was brought provided that in the event the Insured, before reaching the age of sixty, should be rendered “wholly, continuously and permanently unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for any kind of compensation of financial value during the remainder of his lifetime” the Company, upon receipt of due proof of such disability, would waive payment of any premium the due date of which should occur after the receipt by the Company of said proof of such disability, and pay Plaintiff $200 per month during the continuance of such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Stephenson v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. MoyleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kamies Elhouty v. Lincoln Benefit Life CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Mutual Life Ins. v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Bankers Life Co. v. JacobyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Desai v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.