Legal Opinion
Golt v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2000No. 99-459PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 On August 26, 1999 this Court agreed to address three questions certified by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.App.P. The three questions certified by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals are as follows:
Questions Presented
¶2 1. Does accidental death coverage, when provided either as part of a separate group accident insurance policy, or as part of a “Group Life and Accident and Health Insurance Policy,” fall within Montana’s statutory definition of life insurance for the purpose of determining an insured’s conversion rights? See §§ 33-1-207, MCA (defi nition of life…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ZabawaMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Nautilus Insurance v. First National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Life Insurance Co. of North America v. Klingler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Gamino v. General American Life InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kendall Dodson Dennis D. Dodson Jerry Dodson Loyal S. Dodson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. J.C. Penney Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Kendall Dodson Dennis D. Dodson Jerry Dodson Loyal S. Dodson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. J.C. Penney Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Kendall Dodson v. J.C. Penney LifeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003