Legal Opinion

Murphey v. Georgia Pacific Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 1992No. 189A90PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

This case brings to the Court a question as to the propriety of allowing a motion for summary judgment in an action for personal injury based on negligence. When a defendant moves for summary judgment in such a case and supports the motion with a forecast of evidence that would entitle him to a directed verdict if the evidence were offered at trial, the defendant is entitled to have his motion allowed unless the plaintiff makes a forecast of evidence which shows there is a genuine issue for trial. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 296 N.C. 467, 251 S.E.2d 419 (1979); Caldwell v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Deaton v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Diamond v. McDonald Service StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stecher v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. St. Clair v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998
  3. Carrasquilla v. Mazda Motor Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. PEAL BY PEAL v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Peal ex rel. Peal v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API