In re National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in three actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A, move to centralize this litigation involving challenges to local rules governing attorney admission to federal practice in three federal district courts. Plaintiffs seek centralization in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania or the District of the District of Columbia. Defendants,1 judges of the various districts and United States Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., oppose centralization.
*1378On the basis of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re: Medi-Cal Reimbursement Rate Reduction LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
- In re Real Estate Transfer Tax LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re Environmental Protection Agency Pesticide Listing Confidentiality LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
3Cited by24 opinions
- Anderson v. County of St. LawrenceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Armer v. County of MontgomeryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Beutel v. County of JeffersonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Blanchard v. County of EssexDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Bush v. County of SchoharieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.