Legal Opinion

In Re: Medi-Cal Reimbursement Rate Reduction Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 19, 2009No. MDL 2069PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiffs in the Northern District of California action have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Central District of California. Plaintiffs in one Central District of California action support the motion. Plaintiffs in three Central District of California actions oppose centralization or, alternatively, suggest a stay in the Northern District of California action. Defendant David Maxwell-Jolly opposes centralization.

This litigation…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Real Estate Transfer Tax LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In re Aba Law Sch. Accreditation Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
  4. In re Cleartalk-ZTE Arbitration LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  5. In re Federal Housing Finance AgencyUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API