Legal Opinion

M.G. v. New York City Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 2013No. 13 Civ. 4639(SAS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The parents of Y.T. — a child with autism in the New York City school system — filed this action against the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”) and other defendants, and are seeking a preliminary injunction to maintain Y.T.’s current 1:1 applied behavioral analysis (“ABA”) home services and also to add several new services to his educational placement. Because plaintiffs have not yet exhausted administrative review on their claims, this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to consider their request for new…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Navarro Carrilo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. M.G. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Angamarca v. New York City Department Of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  4. Angamarca v. New York City Department Of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. B.A. and H.A., individually and on behalf of their child, L.A. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API