Ilasi v. City of Long Beach
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold that it was error for the courts below summarily to have declared unconstitutional an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Long Beach which, while leaving undisturbed a general restriction to single-family use, expressly permitted continuation of prior existing two-family uses. We conclude that this case should have proceeded to trial.
Because of the summary disposition at Supreme Court, the record before us is very meager. It appears, however, that an imprecisely described area in the east end of the City of Long Beach had been zoned for many years for single-family…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Golden v. Planning Board of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Town of Bedford v. Village of Mount KiscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sherman v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Kerr v. KoemmDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Incorporated Village of Old Westbury v. Alljay Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kasper v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.