Legal Opinion
Overshiner v. Indiana State Highway Commission
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1983No. 2-682A186PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
The Industrial Board (Board) found that Arthur Overshiner failed to invoke its jurisdiction because he requested a settlement hearing beyond the two year limitation period required in IC 1974, 22-8-8-27 (Burns Code Ed.). Overshiner raises the following issues for our review:(1) Did Overshiner timely file his assignment of errors by including it in his timely filed record?(2) Is Overshiner's claim automatically barred by the two year statute of limitations because he, requested a Board decision approximately three and one half years after he received his last compensation payment?
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Allen v. United Telephone Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Slinkard v. Extruded AlloysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Coachmen Industries, Inc. v. YoderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sissom v. Commodore Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sears Roebuck & Co. v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sneed v. Associated Group InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- South Madison Community School Corp. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Chaney v. RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Houchins v. PierpontsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.