Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 29, 2001No. 98-7307Unknown

1DissentMansmann, Circuit Judge

I

Today the majority interprets and applies the “three strikes” rule of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in a manner destined to bar the doors of our courts against a disfavored group — indigent prisoners who have resorted unsuccessfully to civil litigation — even with respect to meritorious litigation that may be their sole means of vindicating a fundamental right. Because I believe that this case falls within a statutory exception, as properly interpreted in Gibbs,1 and that the statute, as interpreted and applied by the majority, substantially burdens…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API