Legal Opinion
Eckman v. LANCASTER CITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 08-cv-05454PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge.
The matter before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which motion was filed October 6, 2009. 1 Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 56(c) was filed November 17, 2009. 2 Oral Argument was held before my former colleague, Honorable Thomas M. Golden on January 22, 2010. 3
This is a civil rights action brought by plaintiffs Ivy Jo Eckman, Adrian Sanchez and Althea Sanchez against defendants Lancaster City, C. Luciano,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Finnemen v. SeptaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Kelly v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Briscoe v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Antony Barasky v. Kevin Dent, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- CARNEVALE v. DIGIOVANNIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.