Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2006No. COA05-1191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

“When reviewing the evidence regarding a finding by the trier of fact concerning liability for punitive damages ..., the trial court shall state in a written opinion its reasons for . . . disturbing the finding or award.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § ID-50 (2005). In this case, Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of Dillard’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict setting aside a jury’s punitive damages award in a malicious prosecution case. Because the trial court failed to set out its reasons for disturbing the jury’s award of punitive damages to Plaintiff, we remand this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newton v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Kearns v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Upton v. UptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Beaufort Builders, Inc. v. White Plains Church Ministries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API