Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
“When reviewing the evidence regarding a finding by the trier of fact concerning liability for punitive damages ..., the trial court shall state in a written opinion its reasons for . . . disturbing the finding or award.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § ID-50 (2005). In this case, Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of Dillard’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict setting aside a jury’s punitive damages award in a malicious prosecution case. Because the trial court failed to set out its reasons for disturbing the jury’s award of punitive damages to Plaintiff, we remand this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newton v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Kearns v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Upton v. UptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Beaufort Builders, Inc. v. White Plains Church Ministries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.