Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
655 S.E.2d 875 (2008)
Bernard SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff,
v.
DILLARD'S INC., formerly Dillard Department Stores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Defendant.
No. COA07-281.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
February 5, 2008.
David Q. Burgess, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.
Poyner & Spruill, L.L.P., by David W. Long and Douglas M. Martin, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.
WYNN, Judge.
A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be denied if there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support the plaintiff's prima facie case.[1] Here, the plaintiff argues the trial court erred in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Jones v. GwynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.