Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Dillard's Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 2008No. COA07-281Published

1Opinion of the Court

655 S.E.2d 875 (2008)

Bernard SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff,

v.

DILLARD'S INC., formerly Dillard Department Stores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Defendant.

No. COA07-281.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 5, 2008.

David Q. Burgess, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Poyner & Spruill, L.L.P., by David W. Long and Douglas M. Martin, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.

WYNN, Judge.

A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be denied if there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support the plaintiff's prima facie case.[1] Here, the plaintiff argues the trial court erred in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Jones v. GwynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API