People v. Handley

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant argues that the court erred in ordering consecutive rather than concurrent sentences on his attempted murder and criminal possession of a *1002weapon convictions. We agree. There was no proof that defendant’s possession of the gun with the intent to use it unlawfully against another was an act distinct from the act of attempted murder and thus the sentences must run concurrently (Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; see, People v Williams, 144 AD2d 1012, lv denied 73 NY2d 984; People v…