Legal Opinion

David v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1976No. 3141PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review from an order of the superior court dismissing a strict liability claim as untimely filed under the applicable statute of limitation, AS 09.-10.070. 1 Petitioner was injured on July 3, 1974. The limitation period for this cause of action terminated on July 3, 1976, a Saturday, when the court is closed. The following Monday, July S, was a legal holiday, and the suit was filed on the next day that the court was open, July 6, 1976. 2

AS 01.10.080 specifies:

Computation of time. The time in which an act provided by law is required to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Channel Flying, Inc. v. BernhardtAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Silverton v. MarlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Winegardner v. Greater Anchorage Area BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Reed v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jenkins v. DanielsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Clemensen v. Providence Alaska Medical CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. McCutcheon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API