Abruzzo v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This tax refund case is before the court to determine whether the court has jurisdiction to rule on the claim involved in this litigation in light of recent jurisdictional developments in Rocovich v. United States, 933 F.2d 991 (Fed.Cir.1991) (hereinafter Rocovich II), regarding the full payment rule set forth in Flora v. United States, 357 U.S. 63, 78 S.Ct. 1079, 2 L.Ed.2d 1165 (1958), adhered to 362 U.S. 145, 80 S.Ct. 630, 4 L.Ed.2d 623, reh. den. 362 U.S. 972, 80 S.Ct. 953, 4 L.Ed.2d 902 (1960). Defendant has indicated that it will not move to dismiss the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Gluck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Shore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.