Legal Opinion

Gluck v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 14, 2008No. 08-194 TPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*610 OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. In this action, plaintiffs seek the abatement of income taxes and interest assessed against them by defendant, by and through the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Defendant moves to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) on the grounds that plaintiffs have not fully paid their taxes for the year in question and that the court cannot order an abatement of tax. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dumont v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Gregoline v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API