Legal Opinion
United States v. General Ry. Signal Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 17, 1952No. Civ. No. 5237PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
Defendant General Railway Signal Company has moved for a summary judgment in its favor as matter of law pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.
For convenience, General Railway Signal Company will be referred to as ''General” ; Westinghouse Air Brake Corporation as “Union” (Union Switch & Signal Company having changed its name and finally become Union Switch and Signal Division of Westinghouse Air Brake Corporation), and Western Railroad Supply Company as “Western”.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Short v. Hotel Riviera, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Sarkes Tarzian Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Curto's, Inc. v. Krich-New Jersey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
- Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.