Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Christensen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Appellant calls attention to the following facts and circumstances which he contends require reversal: The provisions of the will and codicils which grant to him rather broad powers; as trustee he was not required to account to the estate for all the interest collected on the investments, a practice which had been followed during the lifetime of decedent; he was not required to increase the income to the estate upon investments which decedent had owned during her lifetime and which came to him as trustee; there has been no loss to the estate or to the trusts and, in fact, the safety of some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Welch v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McDermott v. Lumbermen's National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dick & Reuteman Co. v. Doherty Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Estate of Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Estate of Bloch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Zimmermann v. BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API