Christianson v. Christensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
Appellant calls attention to the following facts and circumstances which he contends require reversal: The provisions of the will and codicils which grant to him rather broad powers; as trustee he was not required to account to the estate for all the interest collected on the investments, a practice which had been followed during the lifetime of decedent; he was not required to increase the income to the estate upon investments which decedent had owned during her lifetime and which came to him as trustee; there has been no loss to the estate or to the trusts and, in fact, the safety of some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Welch v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- McDermott v. Lumbermen's National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Dick & Reuteman Co. v. Doherty Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of Becker v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Estate of Bloch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Zimmermann v. BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.