Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Scandinavian-American Bank v. Tallman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1902No. 3965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Petition for writ of mandate. The facts, in substance, as alleged, are: The city of Seattle provided for certain improvements, and by ordinance created local assessment districts, and levied assessment upon the real property therein to pay for such improvements. Thereafter the city entered into a contract ahont the 17th of June, 1900, with the firm of McCauley & Delaney, by the terms of which contract said firm were to undertake, construct, and finish such improvements in accordance with the specifications of the contract. At the sama time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil-Cloth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gates v. BuckiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Zimmerman v. So RelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McMorry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Titlow v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Longmore v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API