Legal Opinion
State v. Bejar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1986No. 8173PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of trafficking in a controlled substance. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Bejar, 101 N.M. 190, 679 P.2d 1288 (Ct.App.1984). While the appeal was pending, the prosecutor moved to enhance defendant’s sentence on the basis that the current conviction was a second trafficking offense. See NMSA 1978, § 30-31-20(B)(2) (Repl.Pamp.1980). After the appeal was decided the trial court enhanced the sentence, but only by one year, on the basis that the enhancement provisions for habitual offenders, NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17 (Cum.Supp.1984),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. VillegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008