Legal Opinion

State v. Villegas

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2008No. 27,993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} The State appeals, challenging the district court’s order denying the State’s request for penalty enhancements for Defendant’s multiple, second, or subsequent armed robbery convictions. The State argues that the district court erred by ruling that the State was barred from enhancing the penalty for Defendant’s current armed robbery conviction with Defendant’s prior armed robbery convictions because the issue was not presented to the jury pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We issued a notice of summary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. KeithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. StoutNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RenteriaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API