Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
AQUILINO, Judge.
In this action, duly commenced pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c), the plaintiffs seek judicial review and reversal of the (preliminary) determination of the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) that imports of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Egypt, South Africa and Venezuela that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value are negligible and therefore that its investigations with regard to those countries be terminated. See Int’l Trade Comm’n, Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Brazil,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Usec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Georgetown Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'nUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.