Legal Opinion

Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1955No. 2 Div. 341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

We granted certiorari in order that we might consider what is known in the operation of railroads as the “headlight rule”. In its opinion the Court of Appeals said:

“Also, in this State, a railroad company injuring stock by the running of its train in the night-time at such rapid rate of speed that it is impossible, by the use of *104ordinary means and appliances, to stop the train and prevent the injury, within the distance in which the stock upon the track could be seen by the aid of the headlight is guilty of negligence, which, if it caused the injury, entitled the owner to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Birmingham Mineral R. R. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Cannon v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Central of Georgia R. Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. YatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API