Armstrong v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
On the issue of negligent operation of the train the jury in the trial in the circuit court found for the defendant. The Court *114-'of Appeals reversed this finding, holding that the plaintiff was entitled to the affirmative charge. We interpret the opinion of the Court of Appeals as holding that the 'evidence was not sufficient to overcome the presumption arising under § 173, Title 48, • Code of 1940, the injury to the cow being shown. We do not agree.
It is well to note that the train, the mechanical equipment of which was in good working order, was being operated by an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McAlpine & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Cannon v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. HarperAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. MorrisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Armstrong v. Louisville N. R. CoAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954