Legal Opinion

Capital One, N.A. v. Haddock, Stanley C.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 2, 2012No. 05-10-01028-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice O’NEILL.

Appellant Capital One, N.A. appeals a judgment awarding damages to Stanley C. Haddock for breach of a “cross-easement agreement.” Haddock has raised a conditional cross-point, asserting if we reverse the judgment on his breach of contract claim, we should also reverse the trial court’s order granting Capital One’s motion for summary judgment on his quantum meruit claim. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court judgment on Haddock’s breach of contract claim and render judgment that Haddock take nothing on that claim. We affirm the trial court’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunny Letot v. United Services Automobile Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
  2. Sunny Letot v. United Services Automobile Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2017
  3. Tarsha Yvonne Wiley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API