Legal Opinion

Tinch v. State Farm Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2000No. ED 77168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., Judge.

Horace Tinch and Gerald Clark (Tinch) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm). Tinch argues the trial court erred because (1) there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the insurance policy was in effect at the time of the accident, and (2) the driver exclusion clause contained in the insurance policy is against public policy. We affirm.

Tinch’s father purchased an insurance policy from State Farm. The policy contained a “Driver Exclusion Endorsement” which stated:

In consideration of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Halpin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Hammons v. EhneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Mercantile Bank of St. Louis v. BennyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medical Protective Co. v. BubenikCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Leonard v. Delaware North Companies Sport Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. White v. Illinois Founders Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Barry Simon Development, Inc. v. HaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Stewart v. RoyalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API