Legal Opinion

People v. Stanfill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1985No. F003659PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IVEY, J. *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . †

III

Appellant Was Not Denied Effective Assistance of Counsel by Virtue of Counsel’s Failure to Challenge Appellant’s Arrest as Made Without Probable Cause

Appellant contends he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to advance a motion to set aside the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995.

Appellant argues that there was insufficient reasonable cause to arrest and therefore a Penal Code section 995 motion to set aside the information likely would have succeeded. Appellant further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Remers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cunha v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caplan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. Spicer CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API