Legal Opinion

Colson v. Grohman

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 18, 2000No. 01-98-00992-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERIC ANDELL, Justice.

We are asked to decide if the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment for appellees Paul Grohman, Mike Hogg, Jack Roberts, and Stella Roberts on Joy Niday Colson’s claims for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm.

Procedural History

Colson’s initial suit for defamation was filed against various parties, including Jack and Stella Roberts, on October 4, 1993. Hogg was added as a defendant in August 1994, and Grohman was added as a defendant in December 1994. Colson’s seventh amended petition alleged claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Raymundo Rico, Jr. v. L-3 Communications Corporation and Megan Ridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Wood v. Dawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  3. Colson v. Grohman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  4. David & Francis Mears v. Marvin Smith III, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  5. Fred Samson v. John James Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API